Skip to content

chore: upgrade to fabric8 client 6.3.0 #1656

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 14 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

metacosm
Copy link
Collaborator

@metacosm metacosm commented Dec 12, 2022

DO NOT MERGE: this PR is meant to run CI with this fabric8 client version.

csviri and others added 14 commits December 9, 2022 14:04
Co-authored-by: Chris Laprun <metacosm@gmail.com>
…es (#1647)

This allows for workflows to be computed at build time, only to be
resolved (i.e. associating workflow nodes to actual dependent
resources) when needed.
In the process, the configuration mechanism of managed dependent
resource has been improved to make it possible to resolve the
configuration solely from the dependent resource class instead of
previously requiring the dependent to be instantiated. This is now done
viw the DependentResourceConfigurationResolver class.
* refactor: move configuration processing to BaseConfigurationService

Replaced all the different controller configuration implementations by
only one: ResolvedControllerConfiguration.
@metacosm metacosm self-assigned this Dec 12, 2022
@metacosm metacosm requested a review from csviri December 12, 2022 19:36
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 45 Code Smells

63.0% 63.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Base automatically changed from next to main December 14, 2022 14:53
@csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

csviri commented Dec 19, 2022

replaced by: #1669

@csviri csviri closed this Dec 19, 2022
@metacosm metacosm deleted the upgrade-to-fabric8-6.3 branch September 21, 2023 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants